Evidence of Conceptual Crisis in the Scientific Discourse of Material Civilization in Quantum Physics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70091/Atras/vol05no2.29Keywords:
Conceptual crisis, material civilization, quantum physics, scientific discourseAbstract
This paper aims to investigate the evidence of the conceptual crisis in the deterministic material scientific discourse after the emergence of quantum physics. The paper examines the common concepts among all sciences and specialities, which are: the part, the whole, the structure, objectivity, causality, phenomenon, and cumulative knowledge. To extract its cognitive implications which are reflected on the premises of studying all dimensions of existence, including biological and social, in a way that necessitates their reorganization according to the data resulting from experiments in quantum physics. We have concluded that the evidence of conceptual crisis has shown distortions in the meanings adopted by the basic conceptual system in the deterministic material scientific discourse, demonstrating that we cannot understand the apparent if we view it as deterministic structural relationships in which the parts integrate to form the unified whole that can be fragmented into components for understanding the whole. The apparent relationships do not provide us with complete information about the overall system in which they operate. Therefore, unified systems are not studied except as informational systems (wave function), where their pairs cannot be separated because they intertwine and integrate completely into the whole and emerge as a whole with their unique imprint. Thus, it presented an alternative unified vision of the relationship of the self with the object, where they intertwine harmoniously, giving each its unique imprint without canceling each other out. It expanded the concept of causality to include its possibilities in various directions. It did not nullify it, but rather gave it a broader and wider significance through its unified implications, thus refuting the concept of cumulative knowledge in a gradual sequential time.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 ATRAS journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The DORA Declaration
The name DORA is an abbreviation for San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment which was introduced by a group of editors and publishers during a meeting in San Francisco on December 16 th 2012.
ATRAS Journal has recently signed the DORA Declaration (Declaration on Research Assessment), showing its interest in useful ways to assess and evaluate research. Link to the signature:
https://sfdora.org/signers/?_signers_keyword=Atras%20Journal
By signing this declaration, Atras will follow DORA’s recommendations and guidelines to improve the quality of publication.
The journal also insists on including primary sources and original published works in the submitted manuscripts to ensure improvement in the quality of research.
Statement
This statement sheds light on the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publication of a research paper, including the author, the editor, the executive editors, the editorial board, the international advisory board, the reviewers, and the publisher. All the involved parties should understand this ethical policy. It frowns at and will not tolerate any form of copyright abuse or publishing malpractice. This statement is based on COPE’s Core Practices.
Publication Policy
Atras Journal is committed to following a high standard of ethical considerations and pays attention to the principles and best practices in publishing published by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The papers submitted to the journal must be in cope with the journal’s aim and scope. The journal accepts only papers that are not published or accepted for publication or under evaluation in any other journal.
Changing the name of the corresponding author or the order of the authors (omission, change, or addition) requires signed permission by all the authors of the paper.
The journal does not accept plagiarized papers or any other form of academic misconduct; including duplication, fraud authors, and data fabrication, breaching copyright and prevailing conflict of interest. All the submitted manuscripts should be in accordance with accepted ethical considerations. Any paper that violates these standards will be removed from the publication. Authors are also responsible for any falsification or fabrication attempt.
Publication Decision
Atras Journal’s editor is responsible for deciding whether to publish a paper or decline it.
The validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should be put at the centre of the editor’s deliberation. The editor should be guided by the policies of the journal and the editorial board and should be in force regarding copyright infringement and plagiarism. To ensure the quality of the published papers, all manuscripts will run through a plagiarism checker charge by the assigned journal editor.
Confidentiality
The editor and editorial board must not disclose any information about submitted papers to anyone other than the executive editors, the editorial board, and reviewers.
Editorial Policies and Responsibilities
Editor/ Executive Editors conduct the first review before the papers are sent to reviewers without prejudices of sex, race, gender, religious differences, and all other predilections of the authors. As stated in the publication policy, the manuscript is scanned in terms of plagiarism. If the percentage is below 10%, the editorial team checks if the paper fits the journal’s scope and is suitable for peer review. The paper will be assigned to two reviewers who are selected by the editorial team according to their research interests, specialities, and availability to ensure the quality of the review. The review process will take two to four weeks. Based on the review report, the editor will make recommendations for acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or decline.
Editors’ responsibilities are summarized as follows:
– Editors have complete responsibility and authority to accept or reject a manuscript.
– Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the papers.
– Editors should always consider the needs of the author when he/she wants to improve his/ her paper.
– Editors should guarantee the quality of the research paper and the integrity of the academic record.
– Editors’ decisions should be based on the quality of the paper, its originality, and its relevance to the scope of the journal.
– Editors should preserve the autonomy of reviewers.
– Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to international ethical standards and guidelines.
– Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between, the journal’s staff, authors, reviewers, and board members.
Responsibilities of the Reviewers
– Reviewers assist the editorial board in making decisions and through the editorial communication with the author; they can assist authors in improving their papers before publication.
– Reviewers should respect the deadline to submit their review reports and should notify the editor and excuse him from the review process.
– Reviewers must treat the reviewed papers as confidential documents. They must not discuss the content with others except the editorial board.
– Reviewers should be objective in their decisions and their views should be supported by arguments.
– Reviewers should identify relevant published works that are not cited by the author and signal any inappropriate citation of sources or any similarity between the manuscript under review and other published papers.
Responsibilities of the Authors
– Authors should be sure that they submit original papers free of plagiarism.
– Authors should be sure that all the included sources to support their arguments are appropriately cited and quoted.
– Authors must not submit the same manuscript to more than one journal.
– Authorship of the paper should be limited only to those who made significant contributions to the work. People who contributed to the success of the work should be just acknowledged and not included as co-authors.
– If the author discovers any error in the paper after publication, he/she should notify the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Retraction Policy
If the paper contains any intellectual theft or any type of manipulation after publication, it will be retracted and the author will be blacklisted. The author will take the whole responsibility. A letter containing the retraction reasons will be sent to the author and his/ her institution.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
The editor, executive editors, and editorial board should not use any unpublished materials of the unpublished manuscripts in their own research without the express written consent of the author.
The editor should not be involved in decisions regarding any paper submitted by him/herself or any other member of the editorial board. As all papers submitted to the journal, such a paper should follow all the usual procedures of the journal (plagiarism checking, reviewing, and editing). The editor should follow ICMJE guidelines on disclosure of potential conflicts of interest by authors and reviewers.
Reviewers must keep the information or any ideas obtained through the peer review confidential and not used for personal benefit. They avoid any conflict of interest with authors in making decisions concerning accepting or rejecting a paper.
Authors should disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that may influence the results and interpretation of the manuscript. All financial support should be acknowledged by the authors.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered into the journal system will be used for the stated purposes of the journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
Informed Consent Policy
before starting research, the researcher should obtain the approval of his/ her institution. data and information of people who participated in data collection must be handled with high levels of confidence. Therefore, researchers should obtain written informed consent from authors before data collection procedures, unless the study is conducted in fields that do not require the informed consent policy like literature. It should contain a clear and concise description of the research. The following information should appear in the informed consent:
- The main aim of the study
- The expected results
- The target population
- The significance of the result
- Instructions that the participants must follow
- Any risk or discomfort that may affect the participants.
– The decision to participate is voluntary and the participants have the right to refuse or withdraw from the experiment without losing any benefits from the consent form.
– an approximate number of participants actively involved in the research
Advertising Policy
The publisher and the editorial board of Atras Journal prohibit any time of commercial advertisements. This policy remains in its current status until the editorial board revises the journal’s policy.
Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Submission/Publication
Authors should not publish a paper that describes the same research in more than one journal. Besides, submitting the same paper to more than one journal constitutes an unethical publishing practice. An author also has yet to submit a paper for publication that was previously published in another journal.
Plagiarism Detection
Atras Journal is strongly against any attempt at plagiarism. The journal is against all forms of plagiarism including Self-plagiarism.
Using AI Content Generator tools without appropriate citation is also considered plagiarism.
Authors accept that their papers will be screened by Atras Journal after submission. The similarity rate should be below 10% to proceed with the review process.
Papers are scanned using Plagiarism Checker X
