The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Algerian Learners’ Critical Thinking

Dr. KERMA Mokhtar
University of Oran 2 Mohamed Ben Ahmed, Algeria
Kerma.mokhtar@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-1333

Abstract

This study seeks to investigate the perspectives of Algerian university teachers about the challenges that arise when learners use artificial intelligence tools in their academic endeavours, and the potential impact of these challenges on the quality of education and academic outcomes.
Identifying the potential impact of these challenges allows for the development of strategies that can mitigate potential negative impacts, and ensures that artificial intelligence serves as a beneficial resource rather than a hindrance. This research used a mixed-methods case study design, using quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis methods to comprehensively investigate and analyse the identified challenges. The study included 60 teachers from three Algerian universities during the 2023 academic year. The identified issues include overreliance on technology, superficial learning, lack of creativity and innovation, academic dishonesty, and lack of collaborative learning. These results emphasize the need for further research to develop methods that enhance cognitive achievement and quality learning in Algeria.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence, challenges, critical thinking, higher education, learning process, technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.70091/Atras/vol06no01.8

How to Cite this Paper :

Kerma, M. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Algerian Learners’ Critical Thinking. Atras Journal, 6 (1),125-136v

References:

Acharya, A. S. et al. (2013). Sampling: Why and How of It. Indian Journal of Medical
Specialties, 4, 330-333. Available at https://doi.org/10.7713/ijms.2013.0032
Carr, N. (2020). The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. New York, NY: W.
W. Norton and Company.
Chen, J., & Lin, J.C. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a double-edged sword: Wielding the
POWER principles to maximize its positive effects and minimize its negative effects.
Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 25, 146 – 153.
Creswell, J.W., & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among
Five Approaches (4 th Ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
Darwin, R. D., et al. (2023). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’
perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). Available at
https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Fu, Q. K., & Hwang, G. J. (2018). Trends in mobile technology-supported collaborative learning:
A systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2016. Computers & Education,
119, 129-143. Available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.004
Galán-Muros, V., Bouckaert, M., & Roser-Chinchilla, J. (2023). The representation of women in
academia and higher education management positions: policy brief. UNESCO
Guangul, F.M., et al. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context
of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation
and Accountability, 32, 519–535. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w
Harmon, O. R., & Lambrinos, J. (2008). Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat? The Journal
of Economic Education, 39(2), 116–125. Available at
https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.2.116-125
Heimerl, A., Weitz, K., Baur, T., & André, E. (2022). Unraveling ML models of emotion with
NOVA: Multi-level explainable AI for non-experts. IEEE Transactions on Affective
Computing, 13(3), 1155–1167. Available at https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2020. 3043603
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education Promises and
Implications for Teaching and Learning. Boston, MA, Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., & Turner, L.A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed
Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 112 – 133.
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic Integrity in Online
Assessment: A Research Review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 639814. Available at
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social
Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38, 365-
Available at https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, M., & Smith, K. (2021). Traditional Education in the Digital Age: Perceptions of
Educators. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 152-168.
Kamalov, F., Santandreu C. D., & Gurrib, I. (2023). New Era of Artificial Intelligence in
Education: Towards a Sustainable Multifaceted Revolution. Sustainability 2023, 15,
Available at https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451
Koeslag-Kreunen, M.G. et al. (2018). Leadership for team learning: the case of university
teacher teams. Higher Education, 75, 191–207. Available at
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0126-0
Luckin, R., et al. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in education. London:
Pearson.
McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Treviño, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students
do it and what educators can do about it. JHU Press.
Moten Jr., J., et al. (2013). Examining online college cyber cheating methods and prevention
measures. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 11(2), 139-146.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity
Press.
Selwyn, N. (2022). The future of AI and education: Some cautionary notes. European Journal of
Education, 57, 620–631. Available at https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12532
Shi, Y., & Qu, S. (2022). The effect of cognitive ability on academic achievement: The mediating
role of self-discipline and the moderating role of planning. Frontiers in Psychology, 13,
Available at https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1014655
Taber, K.S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research
Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296.
Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral
Research (2 nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Williamson, B., Bayne, S., & Shay, S. (2020). The datafication of teaching in higher education:
Critical issues and perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 351–365.
Available at https://Doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1748811
Zhang, M., & Andersson, B. (2023). Identifying Problem-Solving Solution Patterns Using
Network Analysis of Operation Sequences and Response Times. Educational
Assessment, 28 (3), 172–189. Available at https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2023.2222585

Copyright for all articles published in ATRAS belongs to the author. The authors also grant permission to the publisher to publish, reproduce, distribute, and transmit the articles. ATRAS publishes accepted papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Authors submitting papers for publication in ATRAS agree to apply the CC BY-NC 4.0 license to their work. For non-commercial purposes, anyone may copy, redistribute material, remix, transform, and construct material in any media or format, provided that the terms of the license are observed and the original source is properly cited.