The Significance of Youth Voices in Shaping and Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Learning and Education
Latifa ZIANE BOUZIANE
Hassiba Benbouali University, Chlef, Algeria
zianebouzianelatifa@gmail.com
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0833-5967
Abstract
There is tremendous potential for artificial intelligence to transform learning and education. But, for the technology to truly flourish, it requires insight from its most important stakeholders, young learners. The importance of youth voices in AI for education posits that the youth should not merely be on the receiving end of AI-informed educational experiences but proactive agents with important contributions. Educators who intersect with serving the needs of young students, outstanding fluency in technological tools among their peers, and idea-generative specialists can help direct how AI offerings should be created to make more engaging ones that work efficiently while accommodating them. In this article, the investigation describes how workshops, surveys, and co-creation initiatives are necessary ways to promote youth participation. The article, therefore, advocates for youth-friendly interventions (workshops, surveys) and co-creation processes. They round out by suggesting that the representation of youth voices in the design and practice of AI for education will not only be impactful but also expected. The future depends on the potential of young minds, so technological advancements must serve as enablers rather than obstacles to progress. The insights presented here highlight the importance of actively engaging young people in AI development and outline some of the obstacles they encounter, along with strategies for empowering them to contribute to the future through intelligent educational systems.
Keywords: Artificial intelligence, contribution, education, learning, students, technology, youth
How to Cite this Paper :
Ziane Bouziane, L. (2025). The Significance of Youth Voices in Shaping and Implementing Artificial Intelligence for Learning and Education. Atras Journal, 6 (1), 137-150
DOI: https://doi.org/10.70091/Atras/vol06no01.9
References:
Abraham, L, Mathew, N. S., George, L., & Sajan, S. S. (2020). Vision- wearable speech
based feedback system for the visually impaired using computer vision. 2020 4th
International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)(48184),
972–976. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOEI48184.2020.9142984
Ahn, M. J., & Chen, Y.-C. (2022). Digital transformation toward AI-augmented public
administration: The perception of government employees and the willingness to use
AI in government. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101664.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101664
Ayeni, O.O., Al Hamad, N.M, Chisom, O. N., Osawaru, B., & Adewusi,O.E. (2024). AI in
education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology. GSC
Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 261–271.
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of
the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and Artificial Intelligence in the United States,
China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers
and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068
Brynjolfsson, E. (2023). The Turing Trap: The promise & peril of human-like artificial
intelligence. Augmented education in the global age. oapen.org
Casal-Otero, L. et al. (2023). AI literacy in K-12: a systematic literature review. IJ STEM
Ed 10, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00418-7
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE
Access, 8, 75264–75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global ai ethics: A review of the social impacts and
ethical implications of artificial intelligence (arXiv:1907.07892). arXiv.
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.07892
Hernandez, K., & Roberts, T. (2018). Leaving No One Behind in a Digital World. K4D
Emerging Issues Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/14147
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European
Journal of Education, 57(4), 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T.-M. (2021). Review of smart learning: Patterns and trends in research
and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 189–204.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6617
Li, L., Yu, F., & Zhang, E. (2024). A systematic review of learning task design for K-12 AI
education: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial
Intelligence, 6, 100217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100217
Linaza MT, et al. (2021). Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Applications for Sustainable
Precision Agriculture. Agronomy, 11(6), 1227.
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061227
Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An
Argument for AI in Education.
Pearson. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/edu.google.com/en//pdfs/Intellige
nce-Unleashed-Publication.pdf
Mcdonald, N. et al. (2023). Ai through the eyes of Gen Z: Setting a research agenda for
emerging technologies that empower our future generation. Computer Supported
Cooperative Work and Social Computing, 518–521.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3611281
Minich, J. A. (2023). Radical health: Unwellness, care, and latinx expressive culture. Duke
University Press.
Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence (Ai) learning tools in K-12 education:
A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9
Zhai, X. et al. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to
Complexity, (1), 8812542. wiley.com

Copyright for all articles published in ATRAS belongs to the author. The authors also grant permission to the publisher to publish, reproduce, distribute, and transmit the articles. ATRAS publishes accepted papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Authors submitting papers for publication in ATRAS agree to apply the CC BY-NC 4.0 license to their work. For non-commercial purposes, anyone may copy, redistribute material, remix, transform, and construct material in any media or format, provided that the terms of the license are observed and the original source is properly cited.