Title: Monster or Hero: A Post-Apocalyptic View in Richard Matheson’s I am Legend
Sofiane MAAFA
Department of English, Faculty of Letters and Languages,
University of Tamanrasset, Algeria
Abstract
Human beings are surviving creatures. They will do whatever it takes to survive. However, as much as they are hell-bent on surviving, humans are also strangely fascinated with the concept of the apocalypse—that the world hosting us will one day cease to exist. This strange fascination with the apocalypse goes way back in history when ancient civilizations expressed their remarkable views regarding the apocalypse. People’s fascination with the apocalypse was also reflected in their literature. Taking Richard Matheson’s novel I am Legend as a scope of the study, this paper delves into the philosophical underpinning aspects of the post-apocalyptic genre. It analyses the author’s portrayal of the post-disaster world. Furthermore, it goes beyond I am Legend to explore the feasibility and the internal consistency of various post-apocalyptic scenarios in literature, prompting broader understanding and reflection on the anxieties and aspirations that fuel these narratives, examining themes of societal collapse, the fight for survival, the reconstruction of civilization, and the search for meaning in a devastated world. The present article aims to shed light on Matheson’s scenario on the apocalypse, which significantly draws the reader’s attention bearing in mind the COVID-19 scenario. So, to what extent does Matheson’s apocalyptic scenario relate to our world today?
Keywords:
Apocalypse, Post-apocalypse, Survivalism, I am Legend, Human Civilization
How to Cite this Paper:
Maafa, S. (2024). Monster or Hero: A Post-Apocalyptic View in Richard Matheson’s I am Legend. Atras Journal, 5(1 ). 36-48.
References
Alt, S. (2023). Environmental apocalypse and space: The lost dimension of the end of the world. Environmental Politics, 32(5), 903-922. DOI: 10.1080/09644016.2022.2146935.
Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and Crake. Doubleday.
Broderick, M. (1993). Surviving Armageddon: Beyond the imagination of disaster. Science Fiction Studies, 20 (3), 362-382.
King, C. S. (2012). Washed in blood: Male sacrifice, trauma, and the cinema. Rutgers University Press.
Manjikian, M. (2012). Apocalypse and post-politics: The romance of the end. Lexington Books.
Matheson, R. (1954). I am Legend. Gold Medal Books.
Mitchell, R. L. (2022). Maternity in the post-apocalypse: Novelistic re-visions of dystopian motherhood. Lexington Books.
Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond good and evil: Prelude to a philosophy of the future. Cambridge University Press: New York. Edited by Rolf-Peter Horstmann and Judith Norman. Translated by Judith Norman.
Romanzi, V. (2023). Staying human in the post-apocalypse: The frontiers of individualism in the last of us and its sequel. JAAAS: Journal of the Austrian Association for American Studies, 4 (2), 311-330. DOI:10.47060/jaaas.sv4i2.161.
Shipley, G. P. and Williams, D. H. (2023). The last real man: Foreshadowing men’s social issues and movements in Matheson’s I Am Legend. Advances in Literary Study, 11, 93-110. https://doi.org/10.4236/als.2023.112007.
Sontag, S. (1966). Against interpretation and other essays. Picador.
Trimble, S. (2019). Undead ends: Stories of apocalypse. Rutgers University Press.
Wright, J. H. (1986). Genre films and the status quo. In B. K. Grant (Ed.), Film genre reader IV (pp. 60-68). University of Texas Press.

Copyright for all articles published in ATRAS belongs to the author. The authors also grant permission to the publisher to publish, reproduce, distribute, and transmit the articles. ATRAS publishes accepted papers under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Authors submitting papers for publication in ATRAS agree to apply the CC BY-NC 4.0 license to their work. For non-commercial purposes, anyone may copy, redistribute material, remix, transform, and construct material in any media or format, provided that the terms of the license are observed and the original source is properly cited.